↓ Skip to main content

Menopause, obesity and inflammation: interactive risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Menopause, obesity and inflammation: interactive risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, July 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00130
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy Christensen, Christian J. Pike

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a multifactorial neurodegenerative disorder, the development of which is regulated by several environmental and genetic risk factors. Two factors theorized to contribute to the initiation and/or progression of AD pathogenesis are age-related increases in inflammation and obesity. These factors may be particularly problematic in women. The onset of menopause in mid-life elevates the vulnerability of women to AD, an increased risk that is likely associated with the depletion of estrogens. Menopause is also linked with an abundance of additional changes, including increased central adiposity and inflammation. Here, we review the current literature to explore the interactions between obesity, inflammation, menopause and AD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 197 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 15%
Student > Bachelor 29 14%
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 56 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 14%
Neuroscience 18 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Other 43 21%
Unknown 66 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2017.
All research outputs
#1,769,229
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#469
of 4,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,830
of 262,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#7
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.