↓ Skip to main content

“Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
421 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, July 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00141
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maribel Pino, Mélodie Boulay, François Jouen, Anne-Sophie Rigaud

Abstract

Socially Assistive Robots (SAR) may help improve care delivery at home for older adults with cognitive impairment and reduce the burden of informal caregivers. Examining the views of these stakeholders on SAR is fundamental in order to conceive acceptable and useful SAR for dementia care. This study investigated SAR acceptance among three groups of older adults living in the community: persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment, informal caregivers of persons with dementia, and healthy older adults. Different technology acceptance questions related to the robot and user characteristics, potential applications, feelings about technology, ethical issues, and barriers and facilitators for SAR adoption, were addressed in a mixed-method study. Participants (n = 25) completed a survey and took part in a focus group (n = 7). A functional robot prototype, a multimedia presentation, and some use-case scenarios provided a base for the discussion. Content analysis was carried out based on recorded material from focus groups. Results indicated that an accurate insight of influential factors for SAR acceptance could be gained by combining quantitative and qualitative methods. Participants acknowledged the potential benefits of SAR for supporting care at home for individuals with cognitive impairment. In all the three groups, intention to use SAR was found to be lower for the present time than that anticipated for the future. However, caregivers and persons with MCI had a higher perceived usefulness and intention to use SAR, at the present time, than healthy older adults, confirming that current needs are strongly related to technology acceptance and should influence SAR design. A key theme that emerged in this study was the importance of customizing SAR appearance, services, and social capabilities. Mismatch between needs and solutions offered by the robot, usability factors, and lack of experience with technology, were seen as the most important barriers for SAR adoption.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 416 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 82 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 15%
Researcher 50 12%
Student > Bachelor 46 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Other 53 13%
Unknown 104 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 50 12%
Computer Science 46 11%
Engineering 42 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 9%
Social Sciences 39 9%
Other 87 21%
Unknown 118 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,083,743
of 25,085,000 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,233
of 5,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,203
of 269,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#27
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,085,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.