↓ Skip to main content

Aberrant Brain Network Efficiency in Parkinson’s Disease Patients with Tremor: A Multi-Modality Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aberrant Brain Network Efficiency in Parkinson’s Disease Patients with Tremor: A Multi-Modality Study
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00169
Pubmed ID
Authors

Delong Zhang, Jinhui Wang, Xian Liu, Jun Chen, Bo Liu

Abstract

The coordination of spontaneous brain activity is widely enhanced relative to compensation activity in Parkinson's disease (PD) with tremor; however, the associated topological organization remains unclear. This study collected magnetic resonance imaging data from 36 participants [i.e., 16 PD patients and 20 matched normal controls (NCs)] and constructed wavelet-based functional and morphological brain networks for individual participants. Graph-based network analysis indicated that the information translation efficiency in the functional brain network was disrupted within the wavelet scale 2 (i.e., 0.063-0.125 Hz) in PD patients. Compared with the NCs, the network local efficiency was decreased and the network global efficiency was increased in PD patients. Network local efficiency could effectively discriminate PD patients from the NCs using multivariate pattern analysis, and could also describe the variability of tremor based on a multiple linear regression model (MLRM). However, these observations were not identified in the network global efficiency. Notably, the global and local efficiency were both significantly increased in the morphological brain network of PD patients. We further found that the global and local network efficiency both worked well on PD classifications (i.e., using MVPA) and clinical performance descriptions (i.e., using MLRM). More importantly, functional and morphological brain networks were highly associated in terms of network local efficiency in PD patients. This study sheds lights on network disorganization in PD with tremor and helps for understanding the neural basis underlying this type of PD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 65 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Master 8 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Engineering 6 9%
Psychology 5 7%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2015.
All research outputs
#20,280,855
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#4,512
of 5,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,563
of 278,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#47
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.