↓ Skip to main content

Phenotypic Heterogeneity of Monogenic Frontotemporal Dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phenotypic Heterogeneity of Monogenic Frontotemporal Dementia
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, September 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00171
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto Benussi, Alessandro Padovani, Barbara Borroni

Abstract

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a genetically and pathologically heterogeneous disorder characterized by personality changes, language impairment, and deficits of executive functions associated with frontal and temporal lobe degeneration. Different phenotypes have been defined on the basis of presenting clinical symptoms, i.e., the behavioral variant of FTD, the agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia, and the semantic variant of PPA. Some patients have an associated movement disorder, either parkinsonism, as in progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal syndrome, or motor neuron disease (FTD-MND). A family history of dementia is found in 40% of cases of FTD and about 10% have a clear autosomal-dominant inheritance. Genetic studies have identified several genes associated with monogenic FTD: microtubule-associated protein tau, progranulin, TAR DNA-binding protein 43, valosin-containing protein, charged multivesicular body protein 2B, fused in sarcoma, and the hexanucleotide repeat expansion in intron 1 of the chromosome 9 open reading frame 72. Patients often present with an extensive phenotypic variability, even among different members of the same kindred carrying an identical disease mutation. The objective of the present work is to review and evaluate available literature data in order to highlight recent advances in clinical, biological, and neuroimaging features of monogenic frontotemporal lobar degeneration and try to identify different mechanisms underlying the extreme phenotypic heterogeneity that characterizes this disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Philippines 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 165 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 17%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Master 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 38 22%
Unknown 28 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 24%
Neuroscience 33 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 12%
Psychology 15 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 36 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2016.
All research outputs
#12,741,181
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,700
of 4,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,423
of 266,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#26
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.