↓ Skip to main content

Older adults can improve compensatory stepping with repeated postural perturbations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Older adults can improve compensatory stepping with repeated postural perturbations
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00201
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bauke W. Dijkstra, Fay B. Horak, Yvo P. T. Kamsma, Daniel S. Peterson

Abstract

The ability to respond quickly and accurately to an external perturbation with a stepping response is critical to avoid falls and this ability is impaired in older, compared to young adults. However, little is known about whether young and older adults improve compensatory stepping responses similarly with practice. This study compares the extent to which young and older adults can improve, retain, and generalize postural compensatory steps in response to external perturbations. Centre of mass displacement, step characteristics and lower leg muscle activation latencies were measured during one training session of compensatory stepping in response to large surface translations in 13 young and 12 older adults. Retention was tested 24 h later. Older adults decreased their center of mass displacements over repeated exposure to large surface translations in both the anterior and posterior directions and retained these improvements. In contrast, young adults only showed adaptation and retention of forward stepping responses. Neither group was able to generalize improvements in stepping responses across directions. These results suggest step training may be beneficial for older adults, however additional, multidirectional training may be necessary to facilitate generalization of postural stepping responses for any direction of a slip or trip.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 128 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 26%
Student > Master 23 17%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 6 4%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 17%
Neuroscience 19 14%
Sports and Recreations 18 13%
Engineering 18 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 27 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2016.
All research outputs
#6,213,944
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,405
of 4,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,705
of 283,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#25
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.