Title |
Review of Sparse Representation-Based Classification Methods on EEG Signal Processing for Epilepsy Detection, Brain-Computer Interface and Cognitive Impairment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, July 2016
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00172 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dong Wen, Peilei Jia, Qiusheng Lian, Yanhong Zhou, Chengbiao Lu |
Abstract |
At present, the sparse representation-based classification (SRC) has become an important approach in electroencephalograph (EEG) signal analysis, by which the data is sparsely represented on the basis of a fixed dictionary or learned dictionary and classified based on the reconstruction criteria. SRC methods have been used to analyze the EEG signals of epilepsy, cognitive impairment and brain computer interface (BCI), which made rapid progress including the improvement in computational accuracy, efficiency and robustness. However, these methods have deficiencies in real-time performance, generalization ability and the dependence of labeled sample in the analysis of the EEG signals. This mini review described the advantages and disadvantages of the SRC methods in the EEG signal analysis with the expectation that these methods can provide the better tools for analyzing EEG signals. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 64 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 28% |
Researcher | 7 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 14% |
Unknown | 16 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 24 | 37% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 6% |
Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
Psychology | 3 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 19 | 29% |