↓ Skip to main content

A Novel CCM2 Gene Mutation Associated with Familial Cerebral Cavernous Malformation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Novel CCM2 Gene Mutation Associated with Familial Cerebral Cavernous Malformation
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, September 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00220
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wen-Qing Huang, Cong-Xia Lu, Ya Zhang, Ke-Hui Yi, Liang-Liang Cai, Ming-Li Li, Han Wang, Qing Lin, Chi-Meng Tzeng

Abstract

Background: Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are common vascular malformations that predominantly arise in the central nervous system and are mainly characterized by enlarged vascular cavities without intervening brain parenchyma. Familial CCMs (FCCMs) is inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern with incomplete penetrance and variable symptoms. Methods: Mutations of three pathogenic genes, CCM1, CCM2, and CCM3, were investigated by direct DNA sequencing in a Chinese family with multiple CCM lesions. Results: Four heterozygous variants in the CCM2 gene, including one deletion (c.95delC), a missense mutation (c.358G>A, p.V120I), one silent mutation (c.915G>A, p.T305T), and a substitution (c. (*)1452 T>C), were identified in the subjects with multiple CCM lesions, but not in a healthy sibling. Among these variants, the c.95delC deletion is a novel mutation which is expected to cause a premature termination codon. It is predicted to produce a truncated CCM2 protein lacking the PTB and C-terminal domains, thus disrupting the molecular functions of CCM2. Conclusions: The novel truncating mutation in the CCM2 gene, c.95delC, may be responsible for multiple CCM lesions in a part of FCCM. In addition, it may represent a potential genetic biomarker for early diagnosis of FCCM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Student > Master 3 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Neuroscience 2 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2016.
All research outputs
#20,342,896
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#4,320
of 4,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,295
of 320,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#52
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.