↓ Skip to main content

Long-Term Use of Riluzole Could Improve the Prognosis of Sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients: A Real-World Cohort Study in China

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-Term Use of Riluzole Could Improve the Prognosis of Sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients: A Real-World Cohort Study in China
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, October 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00246
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lu Chen, Xiaolu Liu, Lu Tang, Nan Zhang, Dongsheng Fan

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness of riluzole in a long-term follow-up of cohort with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in a real-world study. Methods: Patients with ALS between 2007 and 2013 were followed up every 3 months. Survival and tracheotomy were predefined as primary outcome measures. The cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) of riluzole was estimated. The patients in the riluzole group were classified into 1 of 3 subgroups according to the cDDD quartiles. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. Results: Of the 1,540 ALS patients, 415 (26.9%) used riluzole, and the remainder did not. In the riluzole group, the age at onset was greater (p = 0.016), the diagnostic delay was shorter (p < 0.0005), the body mass index (BMI) was higher (p < 0.0005), and the scores for both the functional rating scale (FRS) and the revised FRS (FRS-R) were higher (both p < 0.0005) than those of the control group. The median cDDD of riluzole was 28 (2,800 mg). Although Kaplan-Meier analysis did not reveal a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.780), it showed that the prognosis of the beyond quartile 3 subgroup [cDDD ≥ 168 (16,800 mg)] was significantly better than that of the other groups [adjusted HR 0.488 (0.320-0.746), p = 0.001]. Conclusion: In China, older ALS patients and patients who had a higher BMI, shorter diagnostic delay, and higher FRS or FRS-R scores were more likely to use riluzole. Long-term use of riluzole was associated with a better prognosis for ALS patients, whereas short-term use had little effect on survival.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 28%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 14 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,376,799
of 24,176,645 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#755
of 5,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,330
of 318,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#13
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,176,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.