↓ Skip to main content

68 and FX2149 Attenuate Mutant LRRK2-R1441C-Induced Neural Transport Impairment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
68 and FX2149 Attenuate Mutant LRRK2-R1441C-Induced Neural Transport Impairment
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00337
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph M. Thomas, Tianxia Li, Wei Yang, Fengtian Xue, Paul S. Fishman, Wanli W. Smith

Abstract

Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 is a large protein with implications in genetic and sporadic causes of Parkinson's disease. The physiological functions of LRRK2 are largely unknown. In this report, we investigated whether LRRK2 alters neural transport using live-cell imaging techniques and human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. Our results demonstrated that expression of the PD-linked mutant, LRRK2-R1441C, induced mitochondrial, and lysosomal transport defects in neurites of SH-SY5Y cells. Most importantly, recently identified GTP-binding inhibitors, 68 and FX2149, can reduce LRRK2 GTP-binding activity and attenuates R1441C-induced mitochondrial and lysosomal transport impairments. These results provide direct evidence and an early mechanism for neurite injury underlying LRRK2-induced neurodegeneration. This is the first report to show that LRRK2 GTP-binding activity plays a critical role during neurite transport, suggesting inhibition of LRRK2 GTP-binding could be a potential novel strategy for PD intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 8 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2017.
All research outputs
#13,005,966
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,785
of 4,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,935
of 421,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#58
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.