↓ Skip to main content

ALS Clinical Trials Review: 20 Years of Failure. Are We Any Closer to Registering a New Treatment?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
33 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
347 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
594 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ALS Clinical Trials Review: 20 Years of Failure. Are We Any Closer to Registering a New Treatment?
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, March 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00068
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dmitry Petrov, Colin Mansfield, Alain Moussy, Olivier Hermine

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 594 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 594 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 98 16%
Student > Bachelor 82 14%
Student > Master 76 13%
Researcher 62 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 6%
Other 88 15%
Unknown 152 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 115 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 91 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 76 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 4%
Other 65 11%
Unknown 171 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#453,645
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#95
of 5,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,374
of 323,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#6
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.