You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Impact of Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis on Diabetic Cognition Impairment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00106 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Youhua Xu, Hua Zhou, Quan Zhu |
| Abstract |
Progressive cognitive dysfunction is a central characteristic of diabetic encephalopathy (DE). With an aging population, the incidence of DE is rising and it has become a major threat that seriously affects public health. Studies within this decade have indicated the important role of risk factors such as oxidative stress and inflammation on the development of cognitive impairment. With the recognition of the two-way communication between gut and brain, recent investigation suggests that "microbiota-gut-brain axis" also plays a pivotal role in modulating both cognition function and endocrine stability. This review aims to systemically elucidate the underlying impact of diabetes on cognitive impairment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 10% |
| Japan | 1 | 10% |
| Chile | 1 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 31 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 21% |
| Unknown | 37 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,202,114
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,402
of 4,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,275
of 309,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#73
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.