↓ Skip to main content

Current Experimental Studies of Gene Therapy in Parkinson's Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current Experimental Studies of Gene Therapy in Parkinson's Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing-ya Lin, Cheng-long Xie, Su-fang Zhang, Weien Yuan, Zhen-Guo Liu

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) was characterized by late-onset, progressive dopamine neuron loss and movement disorders. The progresses of PD affected the neural function and integrity. To date, most researches had largely addressed the dopamine replacement therapies, but the appearance of L-dopa-induced dyskinesia hampered the use of the drug. And the mechanism of PD is so complicated that it's hard to solve the problem by just add drugs. Researchers began to focus on the genetic underpinnings of Parkinson's disease, searching for new method that may affect the neurodegeneration processes in it. In this paper, we reviewed current delivery methods used in gene therapies for PD, we also summarized the primary target of the gene therapy in the treatment of PD, such like neurotrophic factor (for regeneration), the synthesis of neurotransmitter (for prolong the duration of L-dopa), and the potential proteins that might be a target to modulate via gene therapy. Finally, we discussed RNA interference therapies used in Parkinson's disease, it might act as a new class of drug. We mainly focus on the efficiency and tooling features of different gene therapies in the treatment of PD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 11 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 8%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,202,114
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,402
of 4,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,298
of 310,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#76
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.