↓ Skip to main content

Toll-Like Receptor 2 Is a Regulator of Circadian Active and Inactive State Consolidation in C57BL/6 Mice

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toll-Like Receptor 2 Is a Regulator of Circadian Active and Inactive State Consolidation in C57BL/6 Mice
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, July 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00219
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas W. DeKorver, Tammy R. Chaudoin, Stephen J. Bonasera

Abstract

Regulatory systems required to maintain behavioral arousal remain incompletely understood. We describe a previously unappreciated role that toll-like receptor 2 (Tlr2, a membrane bound pattern recognition receptor that recognizes specific bacterial, viral, and fungal peptides), contributes toward regulation of behavioral arousal. In 4-4.5 month old mice with constitutive loss of Tlr2 function (Tlr2(-/-) mice), we note a marked consolidation in the circadian pattern of both active and inactive states. Specifically, Tlr2(-/-) mice demonstrated significantly fewer but longer duration active states during the circadian dark cycle, and significantly fewer but longer duration inactive states during the circadian light cycle. Tlr2(-/-) mice also consumed less food and water, and moved less during the circadian light cycle. Analysis of circadian rhythms further suggested that Tlr2(-/-) mice demonstrated less day-to-day variability in feeding, drinking, and movement behaviors. Reevaluation of this same mouse cohort at age 8-8.5 months revealed a clear blunting of these differences. However, Tlr2(-/-) mice were still noted to have fewer short-duration active states during the circadian dark cycle, and continued to demonstrate significantly less day-to-day variability in feeding, drinking, and movement behaviors. These results suggest that Tlr2 function may have a role in promoting transitions between active and inactive states. Prior studies have demonstrated that Tlr2 regulates sickness behaviors including hypophagia, hyperthermia, and decreased activity. Our work suggests that Tlr2 function also evokes behavioral fragmentation, another aspect of sickness behavior and a clinically significant problem of older adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 40%
Student > Master 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2017.
All research outputs
#17,906,525
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#3,830
of 4,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,293
of 312,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#95
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.