↓ Skip to main content

The Dual Role of Microglia in ALS: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
338 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Dual Role of Microglia in ALS: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, July 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00242
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Concetta Geloso, Valentina Corvino, Elisa Marchese, Alessia Serrano, Fabrizio Michetti, Nadia D’Ambrosi

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by a non-cell autonomous motor neuron loss. While it is generally believed that the disease onset takes place inside motor neurons, different cell types mediating neuroinflammatory processes are considered deeply involved in the progression of the disease. On these grounds, many treatments have been tested on ALS animals with the aim of inhibiting or reducing the pro-inflammatory action of microglia and astrocytes and counteract the progression of the disease. Unfortunately, these anti-inflammatory therapies have been only modestly successful. The non-univocal role played by microglia during stress and injuries might explain this failure. Indeed, it is now well recognized that, during ALS, microglia displays different phenotypes, from surveillant in early stages, to activated states, M1 and M2, characterized by the expression of respectively harmful and protective genes in later phases of the disease. Consistently, the inhibition of microglial function seems to be a valid strategy only if the different stages of microglia polarization are taken into account, interfering with the reactivity of microglia specifically targeting only the harmful pathways and/or potentiating the trophic ones. In this review article, we will analyze the features and timing of microglia activation in the light of M1/M2 phenotypes in the main mice models of ALS. Moreover, we will also revise the results obtained by different anti-inflammatory therapies aimed to unbalance the M1/M2 ratio, shifting it towards a protective outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 338 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 18%
Student > Bachelor 60 18%
Student > Master 54 16%
Researcher 36 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 28 8%
Unknown 80 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 94 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 4%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 91 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,537,598
of 24,083,187 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#392
of 5,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,002
of 320,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#12
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,083,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.