↓ Skip to main content

DNA Methylation Profiling Reveals the Change of Inflammation-Associated ZC3H12D in Leukoaraiosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DNA Methylation Profiling Reveals the Change of Inflammation-Associated ZC3H12D in Leukoaraiosis
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00143
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wen-Qing Huang, Ke-Hui Yi, Zhi Li, Han Wang, Ming-Li Li, Liang-Liang Cai, Hui-Nuan Lin, Qing Lin, Chi-Meng Tzeng

Abstract

Leukoaraiosis (LA) is neuroimaging abnormalities of the cerebral white matter in elderly people. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the cerebral white matter lesions remain unclear. Here, we reported an epigenetic basis and potential pathogenesis for this complex illness. 317 differentially methylated genes were identified to distinguish the mechanism of occurrence and progression of LA. Gene-Ontology pathway analysis highlighted that those genes with epigenetic changes are mostly involved in four major signaling pathways including inflammation and immune response-associated processes (antigen processing and presentation, T cell costimulation and interferon-γ-mediated signaling pathway), synapse assembly, synaptic transmission and cell adhesion. Moreover, immune response seems to be specific to LA occurrence and subsequent disruption of nervous system functions could drive the progression of LA. The significant change of inflammation-associated ZC3H12D in promoter methylation and mRNA expression was implicated in the occurrence of LA, suggesting its potential functions in the molecular mechanism of LA. Our results suggested that inflammation-associated signaling pathways were involved in the pathogenesis of LA and ZC3H12D may contribute to such inflammatory process underlying LA, and further echoed it as a neuroinflammatory disorder in central nervous system (CNS).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Psychology 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,528,867
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#3,646
of 4,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,109
of 330,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#94
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.