↓ Skip to main content

Effects of mGluR5 Antagonists on Parkinson's Patients With L-Dopa-Induced Dyskinesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of mGluR5 Antagonists on Parkinson's Patients With L-Dopa-Induced Dyskinesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00262
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wen-Wen Wang, Xing-Ru Zhang, Zeng-Rui Zhang, Xin-Shi Wang, Jie Chen, Si-Yan Chen, Cheng-Long Xie

Abstract

Background: Modulation of Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) may be a novel therapeutic approach to manage Parkinson's disease (PD) Patients with L-dopa-induced dyskinesia (LID). Objectives: The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of mGluR5 antagonists for the treatment of LID patients. Methods: Several electronic databases were consulted up to July 30, 2017. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared mGluR5 antagonists vs. placebo in LID patients were included. Pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Results: Nine trials including 776 patients met all inclusion criteria. We pooled the whole data and found apparent difference between mGluR5 antagonists and placebo in terms of mAIMS (p = 0.010). However, there was no significant improvements on antidyskinetic in terms of LFADLDS (p = 0.42) and UPDRS Part IV (p = 0.20). Meanwhile, the effect size of UPDRS part III was similar in mGluR5 antagonist groups with in placebo groups (p = 0.25). Adverse events incidence was higher with mGluR5 antagonists than with placebo, especially at the expense of increased dizziness (16.3 vs. 4.3%), visual hallucination (10.1 vs. 1.1%), or fatigue (10.1 vs. 4.8%). Conclusions: mGluR5 antagonists had a greater treatment effect on the mAIMS in LID patients, however, there was no improvements on antidyskinetic in terms of LFADLDS and UPDRS Part IV compared with placebo. According to these results, we unable to recommend mGluR5 antagonists for the routine treatment of LID patients right now.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Neuroscience 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Psychology 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 12 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#12,914,110
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,759
of 4,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,728
of 337,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#71
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.