↓ Skip to main content

Sleep Outcomes With Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia Are Similar Between Older Adults With Low vs. High Self-Reported Physical Activity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sleep Outcomes With Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia Are Similar Between Older Adults With Low vs. High Self-Reported Physical Activity
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00274
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy Yeung, Jennifer L. Martin, Constance H. Fung, Lavinia Fiorentino, Joseph M. Dzierzewski, Juan C. Rodriguez Tapia, Yeonsu Song, Karen Josephson, Stella Jouldjian, Michael N. Mitchell, Cathy Alessi

Abstract

We examined whether baseline self-reported physical activity is associated with the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) in older veterans. Community-dwelling veterans aged 60 years and older with insomnia received CBT-I in a randomized controlled trial. Participants who received active treatment were divided into low and high physical activity based on self-report. Sleep outcomes were measured by sleep diary, questionnaire and wrist actigraphy; collected at baseline, post-treatment, 6-month and 12-month follow-up. Mixed-effects models compared differences between physical activity groups in change in sleep outcome from baseline to each follow-up, and equivalence tests examined if physical activity groups were clinically equal. There were no significant differences in sleep outcomes between physical activity groups. Equivalence tests suggested possible equality in physical activity groups for five of seven sleep outcomes. Efficacy of CBT-I in older veterans was not associated with self-reported physical activity at baseline. Older adults with insomnia who report low levels of physical activity can benefit from CBT-I.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 28 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 19%
Sports and Recreations 7 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 35 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,019,263
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#3,413
of 4,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,849
of 337,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#83
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.