You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Less Is More – Estimation of the Number of Strides Required to Assess Gait Variability in Spatially Confined Settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00435 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Kroneberg, Morad Elshehabi, Anne-Christiane Meyer, Karen Otte, Sarah Doss, Friedemann Paul, Susanne Nussbaum, Daniela Berg, Andrea A. Kühn, Walter Maetzler, Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 13% |
| France | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Comoros | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 17% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 20% |
| Engineering | 17 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 34 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,287,170
of 24,037,100 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#1,621
of 5,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,196
of 444,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#35
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,037,100 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.