You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of in-Scanner Bilateral Frontal tDCS on Functional Connectivity of the Working Memory Network in Older Adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00051 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicole R. Nissim, Andrew O’Shea, Aprinda Indahlastari, Rachel Telles, Lindsey Richards, Eric Porges, Ronald Cohen, Adam J. Woods |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 56% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 16 | 16% |
| Psychology | 15 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 51 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,200,237
of 23,653,937 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,081
of 4,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,690
of 353,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#43
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,653,937 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.