You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Regional High Iron in the Substantia Nigra Differentiates Parkinson’s Disease Patients From Healthy Controls
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00106 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kiarash Ghassaban, Naying He, Sean Kumar Sethi, Pei Huang, Shengdi Chen, Fuhua Yan, Ewart Mark Haacke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Belgium | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2019.
All research outputs
#8,343,371
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#3,126
of 5,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,500
of 364,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#55
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.