↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Age-Dependent Relationship Between Plasma Aβ40 and Aβ42 and Total Tau Levels in Cognitively Normal Subjects

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Age-Dependent Relationship Between Plasma Aβ40 and Aβ42 and Total Tau Levels in Cognitively Normal Subjects
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, November 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00292
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lih-Fen Lue, Ming-Chyi Pai, Ta-Fu Chen, Chaur-Jong Hu, Li-Kai Huang, Wei-Che Lin, Chau-Chung Wu, Jian-Shing Jeng, Kaj Blennow, Marwan N. Sabbagh, Sui-Hing Yan, Pei-Ning Wang, Shieh-Yueh Yang, Hiroyuki Hatsuta, Satoru Morimoto, Akitoshi Takeda, Yoshiaki Itoh, Jun Liu, Haiqun Xie, Ming-Jang Chiu

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,260,621
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,047
of 4,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,925
of 365,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#52
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.