You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differences Between Human and Murine Tau at the N-terminal End
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Félix Hernández, Jesús Merchán-Rubira, Laura Vallés-Saiz, Alberto Rodríguez-Matellán, Jesús Avila |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 46 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 31 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 50 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,448,893
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#1,678
of 5,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,810
of 475,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#43
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.