You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phenotype-Agnostic Molecular Subtyping of Neurodegenerative Disorders: The Cincinnati Cohort Biomarker Program (CCBP)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2020.553635 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Sturchio, Luca Marsili, Joaquin A. Vizcarra, Alok K. Dwivedi, Marcelo A. Kauffman, Andrew P. Duker, Peixin Lu, Michael W. Pauciulo, Benjamin D. Wissel, Emily J. Hill, Benjamin Stecher, Elizabeth G. Keeling, Achala S. Vagal, Lily Wang, David B. Haslam, Matthew J. Robson, Caroline M. Tanner, Daniel W. Hagey, Samir El Andaloussi, Kariem Ezzat, Ronan M. T. Fleming, Long J. Lu, Max A. Little, Alberto J. Espay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| Argentina | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 60% |
| Scientists | 8 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 20% |
| Unknown | 32 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,576,696
of 25,243,120 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#414
of 5,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,442
of 423,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#11
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,243,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.