↓ Skip to main content

Validity Evidence for the Research Category, “Cognitively Unimpaired – Declining,” as a Risk Marker for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity Evidence for the Research Category, “Cognitively Unimpaired – Declining,” as a Risk Marker for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, July 2021
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2021.688478
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Langhough Koscik, Bruce P. Hermann, Samantha Allison, Lindsay R. Clark, Erin M. Jonaitis, Kimberly D. Mueller, Tobey J. Betthauser, Bradley T. Christian, Lianlian Du, Ozioma Okonkwo, Alex Birdsill, Nathaniel Chin, Carey Gleason, Sterling C. Johnson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Unspecified 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Unspecified 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,599,746
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,818
of 5,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,029
of 444,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#134
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.