You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Myo-Inositol Levels in the Dorsal Hippocampus Serve as Glial Prognostic Marker of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Mice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, November 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2021.731603 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tim Ebert, Daniel E. Heinz, Suellen Almeida-Corrêa, Renata Cruz, Frederik Dethloff, Tibor Stark, Thomas Bajaj, Oriana M. Maurel, Fabiola M. Ribeiro, Silvio Calcagnini, Kathrin Hafner, Nils C. Gassen, Christoph W. Turck, Benoit Boulat, Michael Czisch, Carsten T. Wotjak |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 18% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 12 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 9% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 13 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2022.
All research outputs
#18,504,575
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#4,072
of 4,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,586
of 431,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#202
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.