You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Everyday Functioning in a Community-Based Volunteer Population: Differences Between Participant- and Study Partner-Report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2021.761932 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Merike Verrijp, Mark A. Dubbelman, Leonie N. C. Visser, Roos J. Jutten, Elke W. Nijhuis, Marissa D. Zwan, Hein P. J. van Hout, Philip Scheltens, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Sietske A. M. Sikkes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 65% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 2 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2022.
All research outputs
#13,865,100
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#3,065
of 4,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,502
of 502,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#153
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.