You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characterizing Differences in Functional Connectivity Between Posterior Cortical Atrophy and Semantic Dementia by Seed-Based Approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2022.850977 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yi Chen, Qingze Zeng, Yunyun Wang, Xiao Luo, Yan Sun, Lumi Zhang, Xiaoyan Liu, Kaicheng Li, Minming Zhang, Guoping Peng |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,291,863
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,065
of 4,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,647
of 442,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#119
of 334 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 334 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.