You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Construction and analysis of circular RNA-associated competing endogenous RNA network in the hippocampus of aged mice for the occurrence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1098510 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mingzhu Zhang, Zizheng Suo, Yinyin Qu, Yuxiang Zheng, Wenjie Xu, Bowen Zhang, Qiang Wang, Linxin Wu, Shuai Li, Yaozhong Cheng, Ting Xiao, Hui Zheng, Cheng Ni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2023.
All research outputs
#15,812,398
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#3,681
of 5,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,916
of 422,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#134
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.