↓ Skip to main content

Diffusion kurtosis imaging of brain white matter alteration in patients with coronary artery disease based on the TBSS method

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diffusion kurtosis imaging of brain white matter alteration in patients with coronary artery disease based on the TBSS method
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1301826
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tong Li, Rui Qin, Cuicui Li, Lin Li, Ximing Wang, Li Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#19,996,386
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#4,454
of 5,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,060
of 237,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#54
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.