You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase: a glymphopathy marker in idiopathic hydrocephalus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1364325 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Namiko Nishida, Nanae Nagata, Keigo Shimoji, Naoto Jingami, Kengo Uemura, Akihiko Ozaki, Makio Takahashi, Yoshihiro Urade, Sadayuki Matsumoto, Koichi Iwasaki, Ryosuke Okumura, Masatsune Ishikawa, Hiroki Toda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,258,310
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#4,514
of 5,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,698
of 221,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#40
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.