↓ Skip to main content

Five Points on Columns

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Five Points on Columns
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, June 2010
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2010.00022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathleen S. Rockland

Abstract

"Column," like "gene," has both conceptual and linguistic shortcomings. The simple question "what is a column" is not easy to answer and the word itself is not easy to replace. In the present article, I have selected five points, in no way comprehensive or canonical, but which may nevertheless serve as a prompt and aid for further discussions and re-evaluation. These are: that anatomical columns are not solid structures, that they are part of locally interdigitating systems, that any delimited column also participates in a widely distributed network, that columns are not an obligatory cortical feature, and that columns (as "modules") occur widely in the brain in non-cortical structures. I focus on the larger scale macrocolumns, mainly from an anatomical perspective. My position is that cortical organization is inherently dynamic and likely to incorporate multiple processing styles. One can speculate that the distributed mappings within areas like piriform cortex may resemble at least one mode of neocortical processing strategy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Germany 3 2%
Netherlands 3 2%
Switzerland 2 1%
Hungary 2 1%
Russia 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 139 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 20%
Student > Master 19 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 9%
Professor 13 8%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 16 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 39%
Neuroscience 33 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 7%
Computer Science 11 7%
Engineering 8 5%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 21 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2012.
All research outputs
#7,771,565
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#452
of 1,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,673
of 104,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them