↓ Skip to main content

DiOlistic Labeling of Neurons in Tissue Slices: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Methodological Variations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DiOlistic Labeling of Neurons in Tissue Slices: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Methodological Variations
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2011.00014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy A. Staffend, Robert L. Meisel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
France 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 98 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 28%
Researcher 28 25%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 6 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 45%
Neuroscience 29 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 11 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2022.
All research outputs
#18,589,103
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#929
of 1,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,400
of 181,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#25
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.