You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Monkey in the middle: why non-human primates are needed to bridge the gap in resting-state investigations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnana.2012.00029 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Matthew Hutchison, Stefan Everling |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 200 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 27% |
| Researcher | 50 | 23% |
| Professor | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 60 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 19% |
| Psychology | 28 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 11% |
| Engineering | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 39 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2014.
All research outputs
#21,275,730
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#1,015
of 1,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,975
of 256,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#27
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.