↓ Skip to main content

Neural progenitors, patterning and ecology in neocortical origins

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neural progenitors, patterning and ecology in neocortical origins
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2013.00038
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francisco Aboitiz, Francisco Zamorano

Abstract

The anatomical organization of the mammalian neocortex stands out among vertebrates for its laminar and columnar arrangement, featuring vertically oriented, excitatory pyramidal neurons. The evolutionary origin of this structure is discussed here in relation to the brain organization of other amniotes, i.e., the sauropsids (reptiles and birds). Specifically, we address the developmental modifications that had to take place to generate the neocortex, and to what extent these modifications were shared by other amniote lineages or can be considered unique to mammals. In this article, we propose a hypothesis that combines the control of proliferation in neural progenitor pools with the specification of regional morphogenetic gradients, yielding different anatomical results by virtue of the differential modulation of these processes in each lineage. Thus, there is a highly conserved genetic and developmental battery that becomes modulated in different directions according to specific selective pressures. In the case of early mammals, ecological conditions like nocturnal habits and reproductive strategies are considered to have played a key role in the selection of the particular brain patterning mechanisms that led to the origin of the neocortex.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Japan 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 70 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 25%
Researcher 19 25%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Professor 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 3 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 45%
Neuroscience 21 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 6 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,223,099
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#1,006
of 1,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,866
of 280,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#26
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.