You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative neuronal morphology of the cerebellar cortex in afrotherians, carnivores, cetartiodactyls, and primates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnana.2014.00024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bob Jacobs, Nicholas L. Johnson, Devin Wahl, Matthew Schall, Busisiwe C. Maseko, Albert Lewandowski, Mary A. Raghanti, Bridget Wicinski, Camilla Butti, William D. Hopkins, Mads F. Bertelsen, Timothy Walsh, John R. Roberts, Roger L. Reep, Patrick R. Hof, Chet C. Sherwood, Paul R. Manger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 20% |
| Researcher | 16 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 30% |
| Neuroscience | 19 | 23% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,278,912
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#244
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,831
of 229,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.