↓ Skip to main content

Extracellular matrix control of dendritic spine and synapse structure and plasticity in adulthood

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extracellular matrix control of dendritic spine and synapse structure and plasticity in adulthood
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2014.00116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aaron D. Levy, Mitchell H. Omar, Anthony J. Koleske

Abstract

Dendritic spines are the receptive contacts at most excitatory synapses in the central nervous system. Spines are dynamic in the developing brain, changing shape as they mature as well as appearing and disappearing as they make and break connections. Spines become much more stable in adulthood, and spine structure must be actively maintained to support established circuit function. At the same time, adult spines must retain some plasticity so their structure can be modified by activity and experience. As such, the regulation of spine stability and remodeling in the adult animal is critical for normal function, and disruption of these processes is associated with a variety of late onset diseases including schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease. The extracellular matrix (ECM), composed of a meshwork of proteins and proteoglycans, is a critical regulator of spine and synapse stability and plasticity. While the role of ECM receptors in spine regulation has been extensively studied, considerably less research has focused directly on the role of specific ECM ligands. Here, we review the evidence for a role of several brain ECM ligands and remodeling proteases in the regulation of dendritic spine and synapse formation, plasticity, and stability in adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 218 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 24%
Researcher 48 22%
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 25 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 31%
Neuroscience 62 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 5%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 37 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2014.
All research outputs
#20,242,136
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#1,007
of 1,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,207
of 259,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#34
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.