↓ Skip to main content

Alpha-synuclein spreading in Parkinson’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
395 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alpha-synuclein spreading in Parkinson’s disease
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, December 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2014.00159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ariadna Recasens, Benjamin Dehay

Abstract

Formation and accumulation of misfolded protein aggregates are a central hallmark of several neurodegenerative diseases. In Parkinson's disease (PD), the aggregation-prone protein alpha-synuclein (α-syn) is the culprit. In the past few years, another piece of the puzzle has been added with data suggesting that α-syn may self-propagate, thereby contributing to the progression and extension of PD. Of particular importance, it was the seminal observation of Lewy bodies (LB), a histopathological signature of PD, in grafted fetal dopaminergic neurons in the striatum of PD patients. Consequently, these findings were a conceptual breakthrough, generating the "host to graft transmission" hypothesis, also called the "prion-like hypothesis." Several in vitro and in vivo studies suggest that α-syn can undergo a toxic templated conformational change, spread from cell to cell and from region to region, and initiate the formation of "LB-like aggregates," contributing to the PD pathogenesis. Here, we will review and discuss the current knowledge for such a putative mechanism on the prion-like nature of α-syn, and discuss about the proper use of the term prion-like.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 395 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 385 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 18%
Student > Bachelor 68 17%
Student > Master 65 16%
Researcher 58 15%
Student > Postgraduate 23 6%
Other 51 13%
Unknown 59 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100 25%
Neuroscience 71 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 69 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 11%
Chemistry 8 2%
Other 28 7%
Unknown 76 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,676,213
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#173
of 1,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,223
of 353,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.