Title |
The discovery of the growth cone and its influence on the study of axon guidance
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, May 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnana.2015.00051 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elisa Tamariz, Alfredo Varela-Echavarría |
Abstract |
For over a century, there has been a great deal of interest in understanding how neural connectivity is established during development and regeneration. Interest in the latter arises from the possibility that knowledge of this process can be used to re-establish lost connections after lesion or neurodegeneration. At the end of the XIX century, Santiago Ramón y Cajal discovered that the distal tip of growing axons contained a structure that he called the growth cone. He proposed that this structure enabled the axon's oriented growth in response to attractants, now known as chemotropic molecules. He further proposed that the physical properties of the surrounding tissues could influence the growth cone and the direction of growth. This seminal discovery afforded a plausible explanation for directed axonal growth and has led to the discovery of axon guidance mechanisms that include diffusible attractants and repellants and guidance cues anchored to cell membranes or extracellular matrix. In this review the major events in the development of this field are discussed. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Canada | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 165 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 21% |
Student > Master | 27 | 16% |
Researcher | 23 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
Other | 14 | 8% |
Unknown | 34 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 20% |
Neuroscience | 30 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 5% |
Engineering | 4 | 2% |
Other | 18 | 11% |
Unknown | 37 | 22% |