↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of increases in functional connectivity in visual, somatosensory and language areas in congenital blindness

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of increases in functional connectivity in visual, somatosensory and language areas in congenital blindness
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, July 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2015.00086
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lizette Heine, Mohamed A. Bahri, Carlo Cavaliere, Andrea Soddu, Nina L. Reislev, Steven Laureys, Maurice Ptito, Ron Kupers

Abstract

There is ample evidence that congenitally blind individuals rely more strongly on non-visual information compared to sighted controls when interacting with the outside world. Although brain imaging studies indicate that congenitally blind individuals recruit occipital areas when performing various non-visual and cognitive tasks, it remains unclear through which pathways this is accomplished. To address this question, we compared resting state functional connectivity in a group of congenital blind and matched sighted control subjects. We used a seed-based analysis with a priori specified regions-of-interest (ROIs) within visual, somato-sensory, auditory and language areas. Between-group comparisons revealed increased functional connectivity within both the ventral and the dorsal visual streams in blind participants, whereas connectivity between the two streams was reduced. In addition, our data revealed stronger functional connectivity in blind participants between the visual ROIs and areas implicated in language and tactile (Braille) processing such as the inferior frontal gyrus (Broca's area), thalamus, supramarginal gyrus and cerebellum. The observed group differences underscore the extent of the cross-modal reorganization in the brain and the supra-modal function of the occipital cortex in congenitally blind individuals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 21%
Researcher 13 20%
Student > Master 12 18%
Professor 3 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 21 32%
Psychology 15 23%
Engineering 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2015.
All research outputs
#17,764,580
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#861
of 1,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,857
of 263,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#37
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.