↓ Skip to main content

Oxidative stress and Parkinson’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 1,271)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
679 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
881 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oxidative stress and Parkinson’s disease
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, July 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2015.00091
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier Blesa, Ines Trigo-Damas, Anna Quiroga-Varela, Vernice R. Jackson-Lewis

Abstract

Parkinson disease (PD) is a chronic, progressive neurological disease that is associated with a loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta of the brain. The molecular mechanisms underlying the loss of these neurons still remain elusive. Oxidative stress is thought to play an important role in dopaminergic neurotoxicity. Complex I deficiencies of the respiratory chain account for the majority of unfavorable neuronal degeneration in PD. Environmental factors, such as neurotoxins, pesticides, insecticides, dopamine (DA) itself, and genetic mutations in PD-associated proteins contribute to mitochondrial dysfunction which precedes reactive oxygen species formation. In this mini review, we give an update of the classical pathways involving these mechanisms of neurodegeneration, the biochemical and molecular events that mediate or regulate DA neuronal vulnerability, and the role of PD-related gene products in modulating cellular responses to oxidative stress in the course of the neurodegenerative process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 881 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 872 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 149 17%
Student > Bachelor 136 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 133 15%
Researcher 64 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 49 6%
Other 119 14%
Unknown 231 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 127 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 124 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 108 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 79 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 74 8%
Other 108 12%
Unknown 261 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,084,178
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#43
of 1,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,826
of 279,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#1
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.