↓ Skip to main content

Lhx5 controls mamillary differentiation in the developing hypothalamus of the mouse

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lhx5 controls mamillary differentiation in the developing hypothalamus of the mouse
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2015.00113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Heide, Yuanfeng Zhang, Xunlei Zhou, Tianyu Zhao, Amaya Miquelajáuregui, Alfredo Varela-Echavarría, Gonzalo Alvarez-Bolado

Abstract

Acquisition of specific neuronal identity by individual brain nuclei is a key step in brain development. However, how the mechanisms that confer neuronal identity are integrated with upstream regional specification networks is still mysterious. Expression of Sonic hedgehog (Shh), is required for hypothalamic specification and is later downregulated by Tbx3 to allow for the differentiation of the tubero-mamillary region. In this region, the mamillary body (MBO), is a large neuronal aggregate essential for memory formation. To clarify how MBO identity is acquired after regional specification, we investigated Lhx5, a transcription factor with restricted MBO expression. We first generated a hypomorph allele of Lhx5-in homozygotes, the MBO disappears after initial specification. Intriguingly, in these mutants, Tbx3 was downregulated and the Shh expression domain abnormally extended. Microarray analysis and chromatin immunoprecipitation indicated that Lhx5 appears to be involved in Shh downregulation through Tbx3 and activates several MBO-specific regulator and effector genes. Finally, by tracing the caudal hypothalamic cell lineage we show that, in the Lhx5 mutant, at least some MBO cells are present but lack characteristic marker expression. Our work shows how the Lhx5 locus contributes to integrate regional specification pathways with downstream acquisition of neuronal identity in the MBO.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 38%
Unspecified 5 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Professor 1 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 24%
Neuroscience 4 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2015.
All research outputs
#18,423,683
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#923
of 1,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,614
of 264,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#35
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.