↓ Skip to main content

Meningeal Melanocytes in the Mouse: Distribution and Dependence on Mitf

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meningeal Melanocytes in the Mouse: Distribution and Dependence on Mitf
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, November 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2015.00149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefán A. H. Gudjohnsen, Diahann A. M. Atacho, Franck Gesbert, Graca Raposo, Ilse Hurbain, Lionel Larue, Eirikur Steingrimsson, Petur Henry Petersen

Abstract

Summary: Melanocytes are pigment producing cells derived from the neural crest. They are primarily found in the skin and hair follicles, but can also be found in other tissues including the eye, ear and heart. Here, we describe the distribution of pigmented cells in C57BL/6J mouse meninges, the membranes that envelope the brain. These cells contain melanosomes of all four stages of development and they depend on Microphthalmia associated transcription factor (MITF), the master regulator of melanocyte development, suggesting that they are bona-fide melanocytes. The location of these pigmented cells is consistent with the location of meningeal melanomas in humans and animal models. Significance: Here, we document and define pigmented cells in the meninges of the mouse brain and confirm that they are melanocytes. This is important for understanding the role of this cell type and for understanding primary meningeal melanoma, a rare disease that likely arises from normal meningeal melanocytes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2015.
All research outputs
#20,297,343
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#1,009
of 1,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,093
of 386,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#29
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.