↓ Skip to main content

REMOD: A Tool for Analyzing and Remodeling the Dendritic Architecture of Neural Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
REMOD: A Tool for Analyzing and Remodeling the Dendritic Architecture of Neural Cells
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, January 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2015.00156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Panagiotis Bozelos, Stefanos S. Stefanou, Georgios Bouloukakis, Constantinos Melachrinos, Panayiota Poirazi

Abstract

Dendritic morphology is a key determinant of how individual neurons acquire a unique signal processing profile. The highly branched dendritic structure that originates from the cell body, explores the surrounding 3D space in a fractal-like manner, until it reaches a certain amount of complexity. Its shape undergoes significant alterations under various physiological or neuropathological conditions. Yet, despite the profound effect that these alterations can have on neuronal function, the causal relationship between the two remains largely elusive. The lack of a systematic approach for remodeling neural cells and their dendritic trees is a key limitation that contributes to this problem. Such causal relationships can be inferred via the use of large-scale neuronal models whereby the anatomical plasticity of neurons is accounted for, in order to enhance their biological relevance and hence their predictive performance. To facilitate this effort, we developed a computational tool named REMOD that allows the structural remodeling of any type of virtual neuron. REMOD is written in Python and can be accessed through a dedicated web interface that guides the user through various options to manipulate selected neuronal morphologies. REMOD can also be used to extract meaningful morphology statistics for one or multiple reconstructions, including features such as sholl analysis, total dendritic length and area, path length to the soma, centrifugal branch order, diameter tapering and more. As such, the tool can be used both for the analysis and/or the remodeling of neuronal morphologies of any type.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 32%
Student > Bachelor 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 8 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 23%
Engineering 4 13%
Computer Science 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,268,318
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#695
of 1,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,741
of 402,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#17
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.