↓ Skip to main content

Distribution of 28 kDa Calbindin-Immunopositive Neurons in the Cat Spinal Cord

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distribution of 28 kDa Calbindin-Immunopositive Neurons in the Cat Spinal Cord
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, January 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2015.00166
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalia Merkulyeva, Aleksandr Veshchitskii, Felix Makarov, Yury Gerasimenko, Pavel Musienko

Abstract

The distribution of vitamin D-dependent calcium-binding protein (28 kDa calbindin) was investigated in cat lumbar and sacral spinal cord segments (L1-S3). We observed specific multi-dimensional distributions over the spinal segments for small immunopositive cells in Rexed laminae II-III and medium-to-large cells of varying morphology in lamina I and laminae V-VIII. The small neurons in laminae II-III were clustered into the columns along the dorsal horn curvature. The medium-to-large cells were grouped into four assemblages that were located in (1) the most lateral region of lamina VII at the L1-L4 level; (2) the laminae IV-V boundary at the L5-L7 level; (3) the lamina VII dorsal border at the L5-L7 level; and (4) the lamina VIII at the L5-S3 level. The data obtained suggest that the morphological and physiological heterogeneity of calbindin immunolabeling cells formed morpho-functional clusters over the gray matter. A significant portion of the lumbosacral enlargement had immunopositive neurons within all Rexed laminae, suggesting an important functional role within and among the spinal networks that control hindlimb movements.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 32%
Other 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 16%
Engineering 3 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2016.
All research outputs
#20,303,950
of 22,842,950 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#1,009
of 1,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#333,477
of 396,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#31
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,842,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.