↓ Skip to main content

Sensorimotor Integration by Corticospinal System

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sensorimotor Integration by Corticospinal System
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, March 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2016.00024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yunuen Moreno-López, Rafael Olivares-Moreno, Matilde Cordero-Erausquin, Gerardo Rojas-Piloni

Abstract

The corticospinal (CS) tract is a complex system which targets several areas of the spinal cord. In particular, the CS descending projection plays a major role in motor command, which results from direct and indirect control of spinal cord pre-motor interneurons as well as motoneurons. But in addition, this system is also involved in a selective and complex modulation of sensory feedback. Despite recent evidence confirms that CS projections drive distinct segmental neural circuits that are part of the sensory and pre-motor pathways, little is known about the spinal networks engaged by the corticospinal tract (CST), the organization of CS projections, the intracortical microcircuitry, and the synaptic interactions in the sensorimotor cortex (SMC) that may encode different cortical outputs to the spinal cord. Here is stressed the importance of integrated approaches for the study of sensorimotor function of CS system, in order to understand the functional compartmentalization and hierarchical organization of layer 5 output neurons, who are key elements for motor control and hence, of behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 146 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 23%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Master 21 14%
Other 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 52 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Engineering 11 7%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 26 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2016.
All research outputs
#14,840,844
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#710
of 1,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,809
of 300,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#22
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.