You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Golgi-Cox Staining Step by Step
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnana.2016.00038 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sami Zaqout, Angela M. Kaindl |
| Abstract |
Golgi staining remains a key method to study neuronal morphology in vivo. Since most protocols delineating modifications of the original staining method lack details on critical steps, establishing this method in a laboratory can be time-consuming and frustrating. Here, we describe the Golgi-Cox staining in such detail that should turn the staining into an easily feasible method for all scientists working in the neuroscience field. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Qatar | 1 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 482 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 475 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 106 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 70 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 63 | 13% |
| Researcher | 41 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 6% |
| Other | 57 | 12% |
| Unknown | 117 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 169 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 44 | 9% |
| Unknown | 134 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,129,063
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#48
of 1,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,380
of 300,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.