You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cortical Terminations of the Inferior Fronto-Occipital and Uncinate Fasciculi: Anatomical Stem-Based Virtual Dissection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnana.2016.00058 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janice Hau, Silvio Sarubbo, Guy Perchey, Fabrice Crivello, Laure Zago, Emmanuel Mellet, Gaël Jobard, Marc Joliot, Bernard M. Mazoyer, Nathalie Tzourio-Mazoyer, Laurent Petit |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 19% |
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 41 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 45 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2016.
All research outputs
#20,328,845
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#1,009
of 1,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,873
of 334,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#36
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.