You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neuronal Subset-Specific Migration and Axonal Wiring Mechanisms in the Developing Midbrain Dopamine System
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnana.2017.00055 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Brignani, R. J. Pasterkamp |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 4 | 22% |
| United States | 3 | 17% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| Mexico | 2 | 11% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 72% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 19% |
| Researcher | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 38 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 13% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 31 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,445,478
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#215
of 1,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,135
of 329,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.