↓ Skip to main content

Cell Type-Specific Structural Organization of the Six Layers in Rat Barrel Cortex

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cell Type-Specific Structural Organization of the Six Layers in Rat Barrel Cortex
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, October 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2017.00091
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rajeevan T. Narayanan, Daniel Udvary, Marcel Oberlaender

Abstract

The cytoarchitectonic subdivision of the neocortex into six layers is often used to describe the organization of the cortical circuitry, sensory-evoked signal flow or cortical functions. However, each layer comprises neuronal cell types that have different genetic, functional and/or structural properties. Here, we reanalyze structural data from some of our recent work in the posterior-medial barrel-subfield of the vibrissal part of rat primary somatosensory cortex (vS1). We quantify the degree to which somata, dendrites and axons of the 10 major excitatory cell types of the cortex are distributed with respect to the cytoarchitectonic organization of vS1. We show that within each layer, somata of multiple cell types intermingle, but that each cell type displays dendrite and axon distributions that are aligned to specific cytoarchitectonic landmarks. The resultant quantification of the structural composition of each layer in terms of the cell type-specific number of somata, dendritic and axonal path lengths will aid future studies to bridge between layer- and cell type-specific analyses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 234 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 30%
Researcher 32 14%
Student > Master 30 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 50 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 102 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 12%
Engineering 13 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 59 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,709,349
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#284
of 1,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,212
of 325,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#9
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.