↓ Skip to main content

Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis: Regulation and Possible Functional and Clinical Correlates

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 1,268)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
96 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
321 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis: Regulation and Possible Functional and Clinical Correlates
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2018.00044
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro Baptista, José P. Andrade

Abstract

The formation of new neurons in the adult central nervous system (CNS) has been recognized as one of the major findings in neuroanatomical research. The hippocampal formation (HF), one of the main targets of these investigations, holds a neurogenic niche widely recognized among several mammalian species and whose existence in the human brain has sparked controversy and extensive debate. Many cellular features from this region emphasize that hippocampal neurogenesis suffers changes with normal aging and, among regulatory factors, physical exercise and chronic stress provoke opposite effects on cell proliferation, maturation and survival. Considering the numerous functions attributable to the HF, increasing or decreasing the integration of new neurons in the delicate neuronal network might be significant for modulation of cognition and emotion. The role that immature and mature adult-born neurons play in this circuitry is still mostly unknown but it could prove fundamental to understand hippocampal-dependent cognitive processes, the pathophysiology of depression, and the therapeutic effects of antidepressant medication in modulating behavior and mental health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 321 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 15%
Student > Bachelor 44 14%
Researcher 26 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Other 36 11%
Unknown 98 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 80 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 9%
Psychology 25 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 6%
Other 35 11%
Unknown 107 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2022.
All research outputs
#730,390
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#27
of 1,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,856
of 344,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.